Do countries that vote against the US trade less with the US Research Paper

Do countries that right to vote against the US trade less with the US - Research Paper precedentThe last report compiled in 2011 confirmed that these countries typically contradict US efforts at the UN. Trade transaction between the US and countries, which continually oppose US initiatives at the UN, are significantly soaked. Some of the to the highest degree affected countries by such stringent trade and economic relations with the US include Syria and Iran. Notably, countries, which vote against the US at the UN typically, trade less with the US. This paper will provide a succinct description of how countries that oppose the US at the UN have stringent trade relations with the US. Bilateral trade relations and tax treaties are established in order to assist countries enhance their foreign direct investment, as well as foreign affiliate activities through dual taxation relief. However, in order for countries to enjoy such benefits, they must have amiable relations, twain polit ically and economically. These benefits are only part of the advantages enjoyed by countries having amiable political and economic relations that facilitate fluid trade transactions. ... As a world super power, the US relatively requires that countries support its proposals at the UN (Worlton, Reynolds, and Stinebower 215). Therefore, when countries vote against the US at the UN, the US pulls out or reduces its monetary support for such countries or reduces its trade with the nation, as well. Syria has presently voted against the US at least 67% of the time. This move has detrimentally affected Syrias relations with the US, particularly with regard to the political and economic relations. As a consequence, trade between Syria and the US has suffered rather significantly. Prior to the 2001 September 11 terrorist attacks meted towards the US, Syrias relations with the US were quite amiable. In fact, after the attacks, Syria provided intelligence to assist the US track Al Qaeda plans (Worlton, Reynolds, and Stinebower 219). However, Syrias contradiction of the US efforts to initiate war against Iraq started the long progression of deteriorated relations between Syria and the US. Another serious contention between the US and Syria emerged when the Syrian government refused to provide assistance to foreign fighters to make use of the Syrian borders to percolate Iraq (Elliott 58). The US is also concerned by Syrias efforts to interfere in the affairs of Lebanon, Syrias protection of the control of Palestinian rejectionist groups located in Damascus. some other issues of contention include Syrias human rights record, as well as the countries pursuit of weapons of mass destruction (McLean and Whang 439). This last issue is one of the most critical areas of contention between the US and Syria, and remains a thorny issue at the UN. The US